Call us on 0845 601 2923
or
 
 
 

Government will accept PAG's judicial review

11 March 2008

According to a spokesman from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), the Government will not be appealing against the Pension Action Group (PAG) judicial review victory last month.

Leading campaigner Ros Altmann told PAG members that individuals may feel it is worthwhile, if they can prove their losses were totally due to the government's maladministration, to appeal directly to the DWP for more than the Pension Protection Fund level of compensation.

However, Ms Altmann went on to say that this will not apply to everyone, since there are already many people who have said that they never read or even saw the government's information, or that they would not have done anything different even if they had known the true risks.

A DWP spokesman said: "We have every sympathy for those who have lost their pensions through no fault of their own. That is why we have committed £2.9 billion in net present value to the Financial Assistance Scheme, which will help some 140,000 people affected."

"We recognise that the Ombudsman and courts have said that some official information provided under successive Governments was misleading and has contributed to the distress caused to those affected. We have decided to accept the Court of Appeal's ruling on that point and will not be contesting the issue further."

Share with:
Contact Us

There are a number of ways to contact us.

We regret, however, that we are unable to accept visitors at our office.

Call
0845 601 2923
or email us

Ask Our Experts
Our pension experts will be happy to answer your questions

Live Q&A
We will even answer your questions live online.
Next session at 2pm on 13 June 2012

 
New! Saving For Retirement Planner

We have launched a new planner to help with your retirement planning.  It can help you identify whether or not you are on course for a comfortable retirement.

 
Future Pension Reforms

Want to know what changes are being made to pensions in the future?